1 00:00:06,299 --> 00:00:04,380 we've been mentioning a variety of the 2 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:06,309 kinds of experiments that International 3 00:00:10,470 --> 00:00:07,930 Space Station the crew members perform 4 00:00:12,810 --> 00:00:10,480 and those experiments come in a wide 5 00:00:15,930 --> 00:00:12,820 range of their different scientific 6 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:15,940 disciplines some of it very deep and 7 00:00:20,970 --> 00:00:18,610 theoretical some of it designed to learn 8 00:00:23,070 --> 00:00:20,980 more about how people can live in the 9 00:00:25,650 --> 00:00:23,080 space environment and some of it is 10 00:00:28,260 --> 00:00:25,660 demonstrating concepts for technology 11 00:00:31,230 --> 00:00:28,270 that could assist future exploration to 12 00:00:33,389 --> 00:00:31,240 deep space and today commander Kevin 13 00:00:35,279 --> 00:00:33,399 Ford performed one of those latter 14 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:35,289 experiments you're seeing some video 15 00:00:40,770 --> 00:00:38,050 that we recorded that was a downlink to 16 00:00:43,139 --> 00:00:40,780 earlier today of Ford performing a 17 00:00:45,090 --> 00:00:43,149 European Space Agency investigation 18 00:00:47,639 --> 00:00:45,100 that's aimed at improving crew 19 00:00:50,969 --> 00:00:47,649 operations efficiency and as their 20 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:50,979 autonomy as well joining us this morning 21 00:00:56,610 --> 00:00:54,010 to talk more about cruise which is crew 22 00:00:59,189 --> 00:00:56,620 user interface system enhancement is 23 00:01:02,699 --> 00:00:59,199 Michael Wolff a senior software engineer 24 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:02,709 and ESA's lead and co-investigator for 25 00:01:06,330 --> 00:01:04,570 the crews experiment speaking with us 26 00:01:08,790 --> 00:01:06,340 this morning from his office at the 27 00:01:10,740 --> 00:01:08,800 european space research and Technology 28 00:01:13,140 --> 00:01:10,750 Center the Nord wig in the Netherlands 29 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:13,150 Michael tell me about the background of 30 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:15,010 this project and how you got involved in 31 00:01:20,610 --> 00:01:18,130 it okay a good morning Pat first and 32 00:01:24,450 --> 00:01:20,620 thanks for the chance to chat with you 33 00:01:26,010 --> 00:01:24,460 about this we our group here at ISA and 34 00:01:29,460 --> 00:01:26,020 our industrial colleagues we've been 35 00:01:33,300 --> 00:01:29,470 interested in improving the onboard user 36 00:01:36,540 --> 00:01:33,310 interface for a long time essentially 37 00:01:40,170 --> 00:01:36,550 trying to make astronauts performance 38 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:40,180 improve and also get better there you 39 00:01:44,100 --> 00:01:41,890 use the satisfaction for when they 40 00:01:46,260 --> 00:01:44,110 actually working up there and the 41 00:01:49,710 --> 00:01:46,270 streams we've been doing this in is 42 00:01:52,500 --> 00:01:49,720 technology demonstrations say building 43 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:52,510 block demonstrations but we're also been 44 00:01:57,240 --> 00:01:55,090 thinking same or in larger term or 45 00:02:00,540 --> 00:01:57,250 trying to establish a path towards 46 00:02:03,660 --> 00:02:00,550 building a is smart assistance a and E 47 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:03,670 partner to actually give a more broader 48 00:02:09,359 --> 00:02:06,970 support I'd say that what we did today 49 00:02:11,699 --> 00:02:09,369 the commander session with cruise is a 50 00:02:14,260 --> 00:02:11,709 building block type of technology 51 00:02:16,970 --> 00:02:14,270 demonstration and often operations them 52 00:02:18,980 --> 00:02:16,980 or maybe a way to help understand this 53 00:02:22,100 --> 00:02:18,990 is to turn that question on its head 54 00:02:24,620 --> 00:02:22,110 what is the deficiency in the way the 55 00:02:25,970 --> 00:02:24,630 crews operate now what do you what do 56 00:02:30,530 --> 00:02:25,980 you see in the current way that they 57 00:02:32,540 --> 00:02:30,540 operate that should be improved well 58 00:02:34,490 --> 00:02:32,550 first Adam I don't think it's only 59 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:34,500 deficiencies we do we do have some 60 00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:36,570 advantages with the electronic systems 61 00:02:40,630 --> 00:02:38,610 on board I mean we can carry less paper 62 00:02:44,330 --> 00:02:40,640 and thereby we get things a little bit 63 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:44,340 more cost effective operations but but 64 00:02:50,030 --> 00:02:47,130 certainly one deficiency is of course 65 00:02:52,220 --> 00:02:50,040 that it takes a long time to spin in 66 00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:52,230 technologies from from ground into the 67 00:02:56,390 --> 00:02:54,210 space segments install validation and 68 00:02:58,670 --> 00:02:56,400 safety aspects has to be taken into 69 00:03:02,450 --> 00:02:58,680 account and this is this is what we're 70 00:03:05,540 --> 00:03:02,460 trying to do especially we've seen that 71 00:03:09,170 --> 00:03:05,550 for manual tasks in-flight maintenance 72 00:03:11,870 --> 00:03:09,180 task type of things the user interface 73 00:03:13,820 --> 00:03:11,880 that is provided today for for the 74 00:03:16,340 --> 00:03:13,830 astronauts is not so-called test 75 00:03:19,850 --> 00:03:16,350 transparent enough which means the user 76 00:03:21,740 --> 00:03:19,860 interface often gets in the way while 77 00:03:24,740 --> 00:03:21,750 they are doing our primary tasks say 78 00:03:28,699 --> 00:03:24,750 you're adjusting available or doing a 79 00:03:31,250 --> 00:03:28,709 repair and prepare and activity their 80 00:03:33,410 --> 00:03:31,260 ability to consult the instructions is 81 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:33,420 hampering them from doing the actual 82 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:37,650 work that's correct and we also seen 83 00:03:45,590 --> 00:03:42,090 that the operation the actual 84 00:03:47,750 --> 00:03:45,600 instructions for avionics task when you 85 00:03:49,550 --> 00:03:47,760 actually have to attune something deep 86 00:03:52,540 --> 00:03:49,560 down in the system you usually have the 87 00:03:54,860 --> 00:03:52,550 operations content the procedures 88 00:03:57,949 --> 00:03:54,870 separated from the flight software 89 00:04:02,690 --> 00:03:57,959 displays and one of our sub experiments 90 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:02,700 today is to deter to go towards the 91 00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:06,570 design where we have both operations 92 00:04:12,050 --> 00:04:09,330 instructions and flight software pots in 93 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:12,060 the same flow in the procedure something 94 00:04:17,780 --> 00:04:15,330 that is not yet available on board we've 95 00:04:20,210 --> 00:04:17,790 noticed that part of this procedure is 96 00:04:22,190 --> 00:04:20,220 to do with the use of voice activation 97 00:04:24,620 --> 00:04:22,200 and there's a piece of hardware that we 98 00:04:28,070 --> 00:04:24,630 saw in the video where the Kevin Ford 99 00:04:30,860 --> 00:04:28,080 was wearing a little headset microphone 100 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:30,870 which is not brand new technology are 101 00:04:34,939 --> 00:04:32,610 you just trying to make better use of 102 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:34,949 what already exists are you trying to 103 00:04:42,230 --> 00:04:38,490 develop something new I would say to a 104 00:04:44,149 --> 00:04:42,240 large extent it is has been in type of 105 00:04:46,159 --> 00:04:44,159 experiments we're spinning in from from 106 00:04:48,529 --> 00:04:46,169 the consumer market and what's available 107 00:04:53,270 --> 00:04:48,539 for us here down on ground and indeed as 108 00:04:55,730 --> 00:04:53,280 you noticed it is it's a felon normal 109 00:04:59,779 --> 00:04:55,740 microphone and headset is using their so 110 00:05:03,020 --> 00:04:59,789 but but a voice dialogue has not been 111 00:05:05,029 --> 00:05:03,030 available for truth before that has been 112 00:05:07,670 --> 00:05:05,039 other experiments our NASA colleagues 113 00:05:09,830 --> 00:05:07,680 have indeed experiment with this but 114 00:05:13,010 --> 00:05:09,840 moving from experiments towards action 115 00:05:16,249 --> 00:05:13,020 or operational interfaces has not yet 116 00:05:18,649 --> 00:05:16,259 taken place and we trying to learn more 117 00:05:20,570 --> 00:05:18,659 about this so we can based on this 118 00:05:24,709 --> 00:05:20,580 experiment we can design systems that 119 00:05:26,749 --> 00:05:24,719 are that this will actually work and I 120 00:05:28,929 --> 00:05:26,759 noticed in some of the paperwork that 121 00:05:32,420 --> 00:05:28,939 one member of your science team is 122 00:05:36,110 --> 00:05:32,430 Italian astronaut paolo nespoli anissa 123 00:05:37,939 --> 00:05:36,120 astronaut has having his point of view a 124 00:05:40,399 --> 00:05:37,949 veteran station crew members point of 125 00:05:44,089 --> 00:05:40,409 view helped you in your in your 126 00:05:47,180 --> 00:05:44,099 development for us yes it's always very 127 00:05:49,969 --> 00:05:47,190 important to have end users involved as 128 00:05:52,100 --> 00:05:49,979 astronauts involved and an Paolo and 129 00:05:53,749 --> 00:05:52,110 also his other colleagues as European 130 00:05:57,439 --> 00:05:53,759 astronaut centers for example Frank 131 00:06:00,829 --> 00:05:57,449 Levin has has helped us both in the 132 00:06:03,019 --> 00:06:00,839 development and in the testing so it's 133 00:06:05,390 --> 00:06:03,029 not only for the final test but we need 134 00:06:07,010 --> 00:06:05,400 all stakeholders astronauts and 135 00:06:09,469 --> 00:06:07,020 operations engineers to be involved 136 00:06:12,019 --> 00:06:09,479 throughout development and testing to 137 00:06:14,719 --> 00:06:12,029 get a product that we think can do the 138 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:14,729 job that we expected to do so how did it 139 00:06:19,369 --> 00:06:17,250 go this morning Kevin Ford was working 140 00:06:21,499 --> 00:06:19,379 with in two sessions on the on the 141 00:06:22,999 --> 00:06:21,509 timeline here with a procedural display 142 00:06:25,939 --> 00:06:23,009 and then with a voice-activated 143 00:06:30,829 --> 00:06:25,949 procedure viewer tell us how today's 144 00:06:32,390 --> 00:06:30,839 work went and I I could only follow it 145 00:06:34,879 --> 00:06:32,400 the same way you did which was the voice 146 00:06:39,350 --> 00:06:34,889 loot and from video and certainly the 147 00:06:40,250 --> 00:06:39,360 paper procedure display look to go very 148 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:40,260 there 149 00:06:45,260 --> 00:06:43,050 fine we were on time and we had the 150 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:45,270 whole test completed we will be very 151 00:06:50,780 --> 00:06:47,690 interested in seeing the data generated 152 00:06:53,450 --> 00:06:50,790 later on it was the voice-activated 153 00:06:57,050 --> 00:06:53,460 procedure viewer that we did and that 154 00:06:58,970 --> 00:06:57,060 task was selected to be as realistic as 155 00:07:01,250 --> 00:06:58,980 possible so this was in an in-flight 156 00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:01,260 maintenance task and with in-flight 157 00:07:08,060 --> 00:07:05,130 maintenance task comes also say other 158 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:08,070 issues and I think there was one issue 159 00:07:14,900 --> 00:07:11,970 with the tools here and that means 160 00:07:17,650 --> 00:07:14,910 overall that there was some some time 161 00:07:21,710 --> 00:07:17,660 pressure i believe and high workload on 162 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:21,720 Kevin and a in such a situation and this 163 00:07:27,230 --> 00:07:23,370 is part of what we want to learn about 164 00:07:30,530 --> 00:07:27,240 also it is it is excellent to be able to 165 00:07:33,380 --> 00:07:30,540 do one thing to do user interaction in 166 00:07:36,620 --> 00:07:33,390 more than one way to voice and 167 00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:36,630 point-and-click but it's of course easy 168 00:07:44,180 --> 00:07:41,250 to do the most a the one that you must 169 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:44,190 use to first so I believe we got we got 170 00:07:49,010 --> 00:07:45,810 some good they were voice commanding in 171 00:07:51,260 --> 00:07:49,020 there but we have a mixture above both 172 00:07:53,390 --> 00:07:51,270 commanding and traditional commanding so 173 00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:53,400 again when we look at the data there 174 00:07:57,200 --> 00:07:55,530 it's both the objective in this 175 00:07:59,810 --> 00:07:57,210 objective data it will be very 176 00:08:02,450 --> 00:07:59,820 interesting to see and I believe that 177 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:02,460 Chris Hadfield is going to do a similar 178 00:08:09,770 --> 00:08:05,370 type of run for you later on right 179 00:08:11,660 --> 00:08:09,780 that's correct so thereby we we cannot 180 00:08:14,300 --> 00:08:11,670 say of course that we have a full 181 00:08:18,260 --> 00:08:14,310 statistical can do a full statistical 182 00:08:20,300 --> 00:08:18,270 analysis but with two and astronauts 183 00:08:22,880 --> 00:08:20,310 performing our experiment we will have a 184 00:08:24,950 --> 00:08:22,890 much better on the idea that only the 185 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:24,960 ground-based experiments that we've done 186 00:08:29,660 --> 00:08:27,690 before that we are hopefully we got the 187 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:29,670 kind of insight we need to design these 188 00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:32,330 systems so what's the next step after 189 00:08:36,860 --> 00:08:35,370 Ford and Hadfield do this you said you 190 00:08:38,930 --> 00:08:36,870 wanted to you need to look at the data 191 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:38,940 but what will be the next step for you 192 00:08:45,980 --> 00:08:43,530 and your team yeah after analysis I I 193 00:08:47,540 --> 00:08:45,990 think we're heading towards more type of 194 00:08:49,550 --> 00:08:47,550 building block experiments for example 195 00:08:52,830 --> 00:08:49,560 having these so-called procedure you 196 00:08:55,750 --> 00:08:52,840 were on a state-of-the-art 197 00:08:58,270 --> 00:08:55,760 and also adapt its user interface to 198 00:09:00,820 --> 00:08:58,280 something that we're more used to on the 199 00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:00,830 ground this is also in cooperation with 200 00:09:07,750 --> 00:09:02,810 our NASA colleagues and the procedure 201 00:09:10,150 --> 00:09:07,760 group there we are also looking at more 202 00:09:12,730 --> 00:09:10,160 wearable system so you should not have 203 00:09:14,980 --> 00:09:12,740 to be floating back and forth to your 204 00:09:16,690 --> 00:09:14,990 laptop for any reason but you should be 205 00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:16,700 able to bring bring your equipment with 206 00:09:21,910 --> 00:09:19,610 you to your to your workplace and we 207 00:09:24,820 --> 00:09:21,920 hope we can test these things in the 208 00:09:27,070 --> 00:09:24,830 near future and of course with with 209 00:09:30,130 --> 00:09:27,080 voice which is one of the new natural 210 00:09:32,350 --> 00:09:30,140 user interfaces we hope we can implement 211 00:09:34,390 --> 00:09:32,360 a full dialogue this time we only had 212 00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:34,400 full voice dialogue this time we only 213 00:09:40,210 --> 00:09:37,730 had always commanding but the system 214 00:09:44,020 --> 00:09:40,220 itself was in a sense silent it didn't 215 00:09:47,010 --> 00:09:44,030 really speak back let's see is that the 216 00:09:49,390 --> 00:09:47,020 goal then and in the long run is are you 217 00:09:53,260 --> 00:09:49,400 trying once this is all developed and 218 00:09:55,420 --> 00:09:53,270 implemented are you trying to create a 219 00:09:57,190 --> 00:09:55,430 system where like in science fiction 220 00:10:00,820 --> 00:09:57,200 where people can talk to the computers 221 00:10:03,070 --> 00:10:00,830 and the computers talk back or you could 222 00:10:05,290 --> 00:10:03,080 say Lily you could have that science 223 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:05,300 fiction picture a friendly hair but of 224 00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:07,370 course it's not only that you can talk 225 00:10:10,990 --> 00:10:09,290 it's also what you're talking about so 226 00:10:15,220 --> 00:10:11,000 it should it should be robust and 227 00:10:19,090 --> 00:10:15,230 resilient a partner or crew assistant 228 00:10:21,370 --> 00:10:19,100 that that can help the crew member the 229 00:10:26,020 --> 00:10:21,380 astronaut and the astronaut team to work 230 00:10:28,450 --> 00:10:26,030 together and share the tasks properly 231 00:10:31,090 --> 00:10:28,460 and give appropriate support depending 232 00:10:33,250 --> 00:10:31,100 on the individual's needs and that is 233 00:10:35,070 --> 00:10:33,260 then we've gone beyond building blocks 234 00:10:38,310 --> 00:10:35,080 and actually we'll build a system 235 00:10:41,110 --> 00:10:38,320 hopefully we have a chance to do some of 236 00:10:44,590 --> 00:10:41,120 testing for this kind of system to 237 00:10:48,090 --> 00:10:44,600 support more autonomous operations when 238 00:10:52,060 --> 00:10:48,100 ISS can be used as an analog foreign 239 00:10:53,590 --> 00:10:52,070 mission beyond low-earth orbit sounds 240 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:53,600 great and actually I was thinking more 241 00:10:57,130 --> 00:10:55,490 of a talking to the star trek computer 242 00:11:00,640 --> 00:10:57,140 rather than how but it's the same time 243 00:11:03,490 --> 00:11:00,650 separately in principle it should work 244 00:11:05,110 --> 00:11:03,500 that to Michael I appreciate your taking 245 00:11:05,740 --> 00:11:05,120 the time to bring us up to speed on this 246 00:11:08,110 --> 00:11:05,750 its variant 247 00:11:10,570 --> 00:11:08,120 sting thank you thank you very much 248 00:11:12,790 --> 00:11:10,580 flooding able to come on like a wolf is 249 00:11:15,010 --> 00:11:12,800 a senior software engineer with the